<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiFi versus WiMax - what&#8217;s in the numbers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/</link>
	<description>Three standard deviations from the mean</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>It depends on what the cities' expectations are.  WiFi-G is here, now, whereas WiMax 802.16e was just approved in December of last year.  WiFi equipment is very cheap, WiMax, who knows.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on what the cities&#8217; expectations are.  WiFi-G is here, now, whereas WiMax 802.16e was just approved in December of last year.  WiFi equipment is very cheap, WiMax, who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>what's your current view of WiFi "vs" WiMax?  Are cities planning to deploy WiFi just wasting their time and money?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s your current view of WiFi &#8220;vs&#8221; WiMax?  Are cities planning to deploy WiFi just wasting their time and money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>BTW, about four months after we got the house wired we sold it.  Now I'm in the process of wiring up the house we just bought--since it has an unfinished basement, the wiring job's much easier than it would have been on the old house (which only had a spider-infested crawl-space).  But I'm basically all 802.11b/g anyway and haven't found it to be too terrible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, about four months after we got the house wired we sold it.  Now I&#8217;m in the process of wiring up the house we just bought&#8211;since it has an unfinished basement, the wiring job&#8217;s much easier than it would have been on the old house (which only had a spider-infested crawl-space).  But I&#8217;m basically all 802.11b/g anyway and haven&#8217;t found it to be too terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>I wasn't going to name companies, but I do have to wonder what they're actually selling.  Belkin is one of those companies I've always associated with very commoditized products like KVM boxes or cables.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to name companies, but I do have to wonder what they&#8217;re actually selling.  Belkin is one of those companies I&#8217;ve always associated with very commoditized products like KVM boxes or cables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/wifi-versus-wimax-whats-in-the-numbers/#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wifinetnews.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;wifi net news&lt;/a&gt; is a good source of wifi industry news and opinions.  He recommends avoiding the current wave of "pre-N" products that don't have guarantees of being able to be upgraded to the final N standard.  The cheapest pre-N stuff is from belkin, which has a pretty awful firmware upgrade record.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wifinetnews.com/" rel="nofollow">wifi net news</a> is a good source of wifi industry news and opinions.  He recommends avoiding the current wave of &#8220;pre-N&#8221; products that don&#8217;t have guarantees of being able to be upgraded to the final N standard.  The cheapest pre-N stuff is from belkin, which has a pretty awful firmware upgrade record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
