<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shimano Capreo</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19841</generator> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-6458</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:29:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-6458</guid> <description>Still have that Capreo wheel and would consider selling? If so, I&#039;m near you in Sammamish.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still have that Capreo wheel and would consider selling? If so, I&#8217;m near you in Sammamish.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1881</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:25:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1881</guid> <description>Jim,Are you still interested in selling your used Capreo hub and cassette? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p><p>Are you still interested in selling your used Capreo hub and cassette?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:55:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1880</guid> <description>Hi Jamey,
It really depends on how much you want the top range of gears and whether you&#039;re a spinner or masher.   I&#039;m a spinner, meaning I prefer pedaling in the higher RPMs to pedaling slower with more power per stroke.  With my standard Ultegra setup, it tops out at the 97-ish gear inch range, which is fine for maintaining the main 20s on the flats.  On downhills, I hit the mid 30s.  I enjoy having the low-low gear for the ultra-steep hills and when I&#039;m just tired and need to keep moving at a snail&#039;s pace.The Capreo worked well for me, and from what I can tell, Bike Friday keeps it adequately stocked.  The charge $75, which is on par with a standard quality Shimano one, though twice what I pay for the 11-32 9-speed SRAM from Performance or eBay.  The special lock-ring remover was an annoyance; even Hostel Shoppe didn&#039;t have them in stock.So, were it me, I&#039;d look at using more standard parts and forgo the Capreo.  (However, if you do go that route, and are interested, I will sell you my used Capreo hub and cassette so you have spares.)Another option, if you don&#039;t have the indexed shifting, is to use a larger front ring.  My original bike had a 61T up front, but its arc wasn&#039;t as compatible with the arc of the derailleur, leading to clunky shifty.Jim</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jamey,<br
/> It really depends on how much you want the top range of gears and whether you&#8217;re a spinner or masher.   I&#8217;m a spinner, meaning I prefer pedaling in the higher RPMs to pedaling slower with more power per stroke.  With my standard Ultegra setup, it tops out at the 97-ish gear inch range, which is fine for maintaining the main 20s on the flats.  On downhills, I hit the mid 30s.  I enjoy having the low-low gear for the ultra-steep hills and when I&#8217;m just tired and need to keep moving at a snail&#8217;s pace.</p><p>The Capreo worked well for me, and from what I can tell, Bike Friday keeps it adequately stocked.  The charge $75, which is on par with a standard quality Shimano one, though twice what I pay for the 11-32 9-speed SRAM from Performance or eBay.  The special lock-ring remover was an annoyance; even Hostel Shoppe didn&#8217;t have them in stock.</p><p>So, were it me, I&#8217;d look at using more standard parts and forgo the Capreo.  (However, if you do go that route, and are interested, I will sell you my used Capreo hub and cassette so you have spares.)</p><p>Another option, if you don&#8217;t have the indexed shifting, is to use a larger front ring.  My original bike had a 61T up front, but its arc wasn&#8217;t as compatible with the arc of the derailleur, leading to clunky shifty.</p><p>Jim</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jamey</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link> <dc:creator>Jamey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:02:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1879</guid> <description>Jim/et al:I am dithering. Capreo or standard?I&#039;m buying a BF, which I will be using mostly for commuting, and for the occasional fast group ride. The bike&#039;s top gear with an 11-tooth cassette will be in the 96&quot;-97&quot; range. A Capreo set-up would get me up into the &#039;teens, say 115-6 gear inches.Indecisice as I am, I am afraid of committing to a proprietary hub/cassette format like Capreo--don&#039;t want to get betamaxed; not keen on buying yet another lockring tool (matter of principle, not the $11); definitely don&#039;t want to be SOL if I decide I want or need a cassette with a lower low than 26t.But, of course, I am equally afraid of shelling out for a performance bike like the Friday that lacks adequate top-end capability...What&#039;s your take on this dilemma? Assuming a 53t big chainring (18 sp), will the difference between Capreo&#039;s 115-ish gear inches and the standard 11t cassette&#039;s 97-ish gear inches be substantial, or would it splitting hairs, say on the order of 1-2mph? (nb: I seldom hammer 53x11 on the flats, but sometimes do going down hills).Thank you,-Jamey</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim/et al:</p><p>I am dithering. Capreo or standard?</p><p>I&#8217;m buying a BF, which I will be using mostly for commuting, and for the occasional fast group ride. The bike&#8217;s top gear with an 11-tooth cassette will be in the 96&#8243;-97&#8243; range. A Capreo set-up would get me up into the &#8216;teens, say 115-6 gear inches.</p><p>Indecisice as I am, I am afraid of committing to a proprietary hub/cassette format like Capreo&#8211;don&#8217;t want to get betamaxed; not keen on buying yet another lockring tool (matter of principle, not the $11); definitely don&#8217;t want to be SOL if I decide I want or need a cassette with a lower low than 26t.</p><p>But, of course, I am equally afraid of shelling out for a performance bike like the Friday that lacks adequate top-end capability&#8230;</p><p>What&#8217;s your take on this dilemma? Assuming a 53t big chainring (18 sp), will the difference between Capreo&#8217;s 115-ish gear inches and the standard 11t cassette&#8217;s 97-ish gear inches be substantial, or would it splitting hairs, say on the order of 1-2mph? (nb: I seldom hammer 53&#215;11 on the flats, but sometimes do going down hills).</p><p>Thank you,</p><p>-Jamey</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:18:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1878</guid> <description>Hi Paer, as long as your derailleurs are set up to handle the size differences in the chainrings, this should be OK on the low end, though it won&#039;t shift as crisply.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paer, as long as your derailleurs are set up to handle the size differences in the chainrings, this should be OK on the low end, though it won&#8217;t shift as crisply.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paer</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link> <dc:creator>Paer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:28:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1877</guid> <description>Hi!I just wonder if it would be advisable to change the lower gear cogwheels on the Capreo to e.g. 17--21--25--29 to get a gear range of approx. 26--119 inches with 20&quot; wheels and a double chainwheel? Personally I think the 20% steps in the low range would be OK to be able to cope with steep parts when touring, while keeping the possibility for high speed. (This set-up is planned for a Moulton NS Double Pylon)Best regards,Paer Jansson </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p><p>I just wonder if it would be advisable to change the lower gear cogwheels on the Capreo to e.g. 17&#8211;21&#8211;25&#8211;29 to get a gear range of approx. 26&#8211;119 inches with 20&#8243; wheels and a double chainwheel? Personally I think the 20% steps in the low range would be OK to be able to cope with steep parts when touring, while keeping the possibility for high speed. (This set-up is planned for a Moulton NS Double Pylon)</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Paer Jansson</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Damon Sprague</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link> <dc:creator>Damon Sprague</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:23:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1876</guid> <description>I build 406 wheels and would be interested in building purchasing your old one. I will then locate the needed tool and toy around with this gearing on my sons 24&quot; mountain bike that because of the smaller wheel size, has extreamly low gearing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I build 406 wheels and would be interested in building purchasing your old one. I will then locate the needed tool and toy around with this gearing on my sons 24&#8243; mountain bike that because of the smaller wheel size, has extreamly low gearing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1875</guid> <description>Hey! I found your site when I was searching on the Capreo system.I have a KHS folder I&#039;m kitting out for touring. I was thinking of the Capreo system too but had some concern about the non-standard nature of the hub and cogs. Thanks for the straight-dope on that...sounds like something that could cause a small problem to turn into a big problem - especially in a remote area.Some other folks have suggested a Schlumpf speed-drive to bump up the gearing - any thoughts on that?&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I found your site when I was searching on the Capreo system.</p><p>I have a KHS folder I&#8217;m kitting out for touring. I was thinking of the Capreo system too but had some concern about the non-standard nature of the hub and cogs. Thanks for the straight-dope on that&#8230;sounds like something that could cause a small problem to turn into a big problem &#8211; especially in a remote area.</p><p>Some other folks have suggested a Schlumpf speed-drive to bump up the gearing &#8211; any thoughts on that?</p><p><a
href="http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jim</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link> <dc:creator>jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1874</guid> <description>I kept the braze-on, but ground down the front derailleur.  See picture:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jimcarson.com/i/capreo/front_derailleur.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept the braze-on, but ground down the front derailleur.  See picture:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.jimcarson.com/i/capreo/front_derailleur.jpg?4c9b33" rel="nofollow">here</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rob wendel</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link> <dc:creator>rob wendel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:19:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1873</guid> <description>I have a bike friday that came with the same set up as your original.  I too have switched to a capreo and more normal triple front chainrings.
My mechanic was unhappy about how high the front derailleur sits because of the braze-on.  It seems to work, but the clearance is too high.
So, was it easy to get the braze-on ground off?  I wonder if I should do?
rob </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bike friday that came with the same set up as your original.  I too have switched to a capreo and more normal triple front chainrings.<br
/> My mechanic was unhappy about how high the front derailleur sits because of the braze-on.  It seems to work, but the clearance is too high.<br
/> So, was it easy to get the braze-on ground off?  I wonder if I should do?<br
/> rob</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BelindaL</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link> <dc:creator>BelindaL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1872</guid> <description>Coolness.  Congrats on finding the right gearing.  If you still have trouble with the chain jumping off into oblivion, they make these little &quot;chain deflectors&quot; you can get that prevent this unwanted behavior.  The &quot;dog fang&quot; by a company called Deda is the one I have on my bike.  Tom down at Issaquah Ski and Cycle sells what appears to be a better one.    Spew on, brother! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coolness.  Congrats on finding the right gearing.  If you still have trouble with the chain jumping off into oblivion, they make these little &#8220;chain deflectors&#8221; you can get that prevent this unwanted behavior.  The &#8220;dog fang&#8221; by a company called Deda is the one I have on my bike.  Tom down at Issaquah Ski and Cycle sells what appears to be a better one.    Spew on, brother!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DougW</title><link>http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/comment-page-1/#comment-1871</link> <dc:creator>DougW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimcarson.com/2005/shimano-capreo/#comment-1871</guid> <description>Forget the cooking man, keep spewing out the bike geek goodness!  :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the cooking man, keep spewing out the bike geek goodness!  :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/17 queries in 0.041 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 612/613 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.jimcarson.com @ 2012-02-08 16:32:10 -->
