Categories

« Pssst... want to buy the web? | Main | Self-assessment »

T'Pol

Let's get this straight: I know it's just a TV show. However, since Mitch already beat me to the punch on the recent Enterprise episode, I thought I'd weigh in, too.

I like Enterprise, and it's the only show that I currently make any effort to watch. After so much techno-babble from the previous Treks, it's quite comical to see the humans bumbling through the galaxy: transporters don't work well enough that anyone seriously considers using them, every hostile alien they run into beats the tar out of them, and when they need to pick something up, it's with a fricking harpoon ("grappling hook").

Thus, I am somewhat worried about the huge story arc in season 3. I don't watch much television and am likely to miss an episode or two. These huge arcs are really hard to follow over the long-term and were what eventually drove me away from ST:DS9 (when did the Cardassians become allies and the Klingons enemies?), ST:Voyager (when did Kess become such a butthead?) and X-files (WTF's the Terminator doing in the show?).

What are you looking
at, Pinkskin?
The races are hit or miss. For example, I like the Andorians, especially the movable antenna. They're like a dog's tail: you have very little doubt what's on their mind. Sure, Shran is paranoid and xenophobic, but he's honest. Any episode he's in is bound to entertain. The Klingons are essentially a side show. I think my familiarity with them from the movies/TNG/DS9 days has tainted my enjoyment. But you know, I enjoy a strange satisfaction seeing Archer take out a couple of them when going mano-y-mano.

These aren't the
musicians you're
looking for.
I don't know enough about the Xindi, but every time I see the council of the five races meet, I think of the cantina in Mos Eisley Space Port (Star Wars IV, for those of you born after 1980). In reverse order of xenophobic paranoia and irrationalization, we have the insect species, the lizard species, the um... aquatic mammal species, the hairy/sloth species and the humanoid species. We're obviously missing an avian species.

The Suliban are really creepy to watch crawl and stick to the ceiling. Except for Silik, they're just the Jem'Hdar henchmen called in to advance the action a bit. And then there are the Vulcans who, except for T'Pol (more on that later), they all are real assholes.

Specific Characters:
May I watch
you mate?
Phlox reminds me of my favorite professor: smart, able to cut right through the bullshit to the real point, and a real pervert. Sure, I admit I wouldn't object my doctor insisting I practice Vulcan ... um... Accupressure with some of my female colleagues. But I guarantee you that if Phlox worked for my employer, he'd already have been fired faster than you could say "sexual harassment lawsuit."

Tucker is a down to earth guy you'd want to have on your ship. He's not afraid to roll his sleeves up, calls bullshit when he needs to, has enough cajones to be believable, but doesn't suffer from an ego problem. Unlike Lt. Reed, who's too stiff yet lacks a spine when getting ripped by Archer.

I keep waiting for the teaser "We've replaced Mayweather with Folger's Crystals. Let's see if anyone notices!" I would like to see more of his youthful enthusiasm (such as was displayed in Terra Nova), but he's had very little to do... even less than Hoshi, whose character reminds me of some bubbly friends I have that are fun to hang around with, but not the type I'd entrust with any serious heavy lifting, if you know what I mean.

Archer is enjoyable to watch. He knows he's in command, will make the decision and will learn from his frackups. Picard was at his best when it was obvious he was in command. (And yes, Mitch, I liked Scott Bacula from his Quantum Leap days more than I liked Patrick Stewart from that horrible movie Life Force about nekkid female vampires.)

746 days left 'til Pon Farr!
Finally, we come to T'Pol. The first/science officer is a strange role to watch. For example, in ST:TOS, Spock was more interesting was when he was "different," whether this was being really Vulcan (like the Pon Farr episode) or being not like a Vulcan at all (the movies). In ST:TNG, Data was pretty ancillary as an unemotinoal robot. Once he had conflict, such as the emotion chip, building Lal, or dating ensign whatshername, he then became interesting.

With that being said, we see T'Pol as a junior officer initially stuck on an assignment she finds mildly distasteful. After the first mission, she appreciates the opportunities available and engages. (Remember Sisko's reaction upon first getting his transfer to DS9?) Last season, we've seen bits of her character development pop out. And now in season 3, we're seeing the rest of her pop out. I hope it fits into the long-term Enterprise, and is not just a cheap ploy to boost ratings.
8 Comments:
Director Mitch wrote on (October 6, 2003 3:52 PM)

Hey, Jim, good overview. My posting was specifically about the "lesbian" scene (not that there's anything wrong with that). Ofcourse after 50 minutes of the episode THAT scene was the EXACT moment when Mrs. Director walked in and wondered WHAT I was watching:

"It's Enterprise, dear"

"Uh, huh. What's that woman doing to the Vulcan chick. And don't tell me it's a mind meld."

"Actually, I don't know what's she's doing, but I'm enoying watching it"

You echo a lot of my other thoughts on the series:

1. Council of the five races - My thoughts on this were the following

- "Boy, they's spending more on CG this year with those insect guys!". They also reminded me of the insect sorta people in the latest installment of Star Wars.

- Those guys swimming around remind me of the Navigator guy swimming around in his tank in the Lynch Dune Movie.

2. Story Arc - Read my mind on this one. I never could follow DS9 since I always seemed to get in an episode once a month. And I would always sit there going "who's that?", "what?", "huh?". Ditto X Files.

Ofcourse that was PRE-Tivo. So I am confident in following Enterprise this season.

I am actually hopeful about this story arc. It gives the show some direction that I think was lacking in the previous seasons. The whole Vulcan/Human tension thing didn't seem to be working well and couldn't carry the show. Technically they should be early "explorers", so the show would just have them running into interesting situations with different civilizations, species, etc. The problem with that is that it was done - that was the original Star Trek series and I think is not as interesting any more. TNG was more about managing the established races/species and getting more depth (I liked the whole Duras/Klingon thing they did). Voyager was about going home.

So unlike previous seasons, I am actually curious about what is going to happen.

Director Mitch wrote on (October 10, 2003 9:03 AM)

Okay, after this week's show, I couldn't resist doing ANOTHER installment on my blog of the executive and his hapless lackey (who I now call Jenkins).

carson wrote on (October 10, 2003 8:57 PM)

Ah, the Zombie Vulcan Undead.

The folks who write the teasers are doing a bang-up job at making them totally misleading. Like last week's, where one might infer Archer was a man on a mission to boldly go all the way (so to speak). And this week, where we see T'pol convulsing like a mad woman. I can't tell you how much I was dreading this episode based on that preview.

But Mayweather got more to do!

> I liked the whole Duras/Klingon thing they did

Me too. Back when I could follow it, those arcs were great. I really hated holodeck episodes. Q was always fun.

DS9 had a lot of interesting characters, but I lost interest because of the arcs. I think my favorite was Garak, the Cardassian tailor/spy guy.

Director Mitch wrote on (October 11, 2003 5:14 PM)

> I think my favorite was Garak

Garak ruled - at least for the, what, 15 episodes I saw of the show. Besides the story arc problem, the show always seemed to change time slots so I had problems finding it each week. I am waiting for some station to start running it again in my area (we have a local station rerunning "Voyager", which I actually missed the first time out, and after being "caught up" on it, can't say that I missed too much the first time).

carson wrote on (October 11, 2003 5:25 PM)

I'm still trying to work on in a TiVo somehow. The freeware system I built generally worked, but because my TV and VCR are so ancient, there was no way to pipe the PC output into the TV. (And it kind of sucked watching a little screen.)

Oh, I don't watch that much TV to really justify that, and the paradox of buying a TiVo to watch more is lost on my spouse. However, I just re-joined Netflix, which I had dropped for the summer. (Current rentals: Adaptation, Star Trek: Nemesis, and Lord of the Rings I)

carson wrote on (October 11, 2003 5:33 PM)

As far as ST:Voyager goes... I never really was drawn into it like I was the other serieses. (Is there such thing as a plural of series?)

There were a few good episodes like "Tuvix," where Tuvok and Neelix were merged by the transporter -- one of the few interesting transporter error episodes. The arc with Species 8472 (http://www.lifeforms.fsnet.co.uk/species_8472_1.htm) and Jeri Ryan had some potential, but I could never keep up with the show to enjoy it.

St. Heave of the Wandering Focus wrote on (October 22, 2003 1:05 PM)

Rick Berman using sexually suggestive themes, costumes, promos as a way to build ratings? Why I've never heard of such a thing.

Actually I am rethinking my grudge against Berman and company for "sexifying" Star Trek for the simple reason that when I look back at the orginal series (TOS) I see that old Gene was probably trying to do the same sort of thing, but to our young jaded eyes in the seventies and eighties, it just seemed pretty tame in comparison.

I think the hill that they have to get over is somehow fitting in the sexuallity into the shows in more subtle or better yet plausible ways.

Sexual tension between crewmembers on a small ship -> believable, weekly groupe and feel in the decon chamber -> Only in the california governer's house.

Long live HUGTIBBS.

carson wrote on (October 26, 2003 10:12 PM)

> Gene was probably trying to do the same sort of thing

I'm sure you're probably right. As I recall, TOS had a bugger of a time during its original run, getting cut until massive fan outpouring helped save it another year. Was Gene married to Majel Barrett at the time, or did that happen during the show?

> Long live HUGTIBBS

Initiating auto-trace.....
Would you like to talk to CHUCK?

(Editor note: this is a reference to my 300 baud BBS days.)

Seattle Area Weather

Mist: 51° F, wind 170°@ 18 mph, visibility 2 mi, 87% humidity

Recent Comments

jim on Hello Kitty bag: My wardrobe is specially designed to emit a stealth field le

susan dennis on Hello Kitty bag: PLEASE tell me you have a matching outfit. Or at least a sn

jim on 22 seconds longer: John: I might be up for a New Year's Eve ride, ideally short

Stacy on 22 seconds longer: I'd like my mocha back, please. hee. Congratulations, Jim.

John on 22 seconds longer: Gee, I was hopin' you would need to join me for the new year

Tag cloud

December 2007

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
[ the archives (1.0) ]
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here


Got a comment? Is something broken? Email me at .
I appreciate and read every email, but I'm so deluged, that I can no longer respond personally. Please don't be offended.


deformity-laggardly